Legal Opinion

Gordon v. Hailey and Bumpass, Contractors, Inc.

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided March 22, 1962No. 3 Div. 988PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MERRILL, Justice.

This appeal is from an order of discontinuance in favor of defendant and from the order overruling a motion designated as-a “motion for a rehearing.”

Appellant sued “Hailey and Bumpass, Contractors, Inc., a corporation, X and Y Corporations, and John Doe and Richard Roe whose names are unknown to plaintiff but will be supplied on information,” for $5,000 damages.

The sheriff’s return shows that the summons and complaint was served “on J. S. Hailey, defendant” on June 15, 1960. The-defendant filed the following verified plea on July 11, 1960:

“Comes Hailey and Bumpass, defendant…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Roth v. ScruggsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1925
  2. Ewart v. CunninghamSupreme Court of Alabama · 1929
  3. Steele v. BookerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1920
  4. McKelvey-coats Furniture Co. v. DoeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1940
  5. Alabama Great Southern R. Co. v. LawlerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1925

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Hughes v. CoxSupreme Court of Alabama · 1992
  2. Gordon v. Hailey and Bumpass, Contractors, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1962

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API