Legal Opinion

Raines v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Company

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided July 15, 1970No. 7012DC325PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCampbell, J.

For the defendant to be obligated to pay the claim of the plaintiff here, the injury of the plaintiff’s deceased must have been, as the insurance contract states, “. . . caused by accident and arising out of the ownership, maintenance or use of the automobile.” We hold that the accidental shooting of Benjamin Raines, under the facts of this case, did not arise out of the ownership, maintenance or use of the automobile which is the vehicle insured under the defendant’s policy. No casual connection between the discharge of the pistol and the “ownership, maintenance or use” of the parked…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. National Union F. Ins. Co. of Pittsburgh, Pa. v. BruecksNebraska Supreme Court · 1966
  2. Mason v. Celina Mutual Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Colorado · 1967
  3. Williams v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  4. Whisnant v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Insurance Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1965

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. State Capital Insurance v. Nationwide Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
  2. Mid-Century Insurance Co. of Texas v. LindseyTexas Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Reliance Insurance v. WalkerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1977
  4. Cameron Mutual Insurance Co. v. WardMissouri Court of Appeals · 1980
  5. Nationwide Mutual Insurance v. Knight Ex Rel. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1977

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API