Legal Opinion

Eureka Pub. Co. v. First Nat. Bank of Stigler

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided July 11, 1916No. 7608PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Error from District Court, Haskell County; W. H. Brown, Judge. Action by the First National Bank of Stigler against the Eureka Publishing Company. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

EDWARDS, C.

The parties will be designated as plaintiff and defendant, according to their position in the lower court.

This action' is upon a negotiable promissory note in the sum of $1,012.50, signed, “The Eureka Pub. Co., by E. B. Wallace, Treas.,” payable to said First National Bank of Stigler. The petition is in the usual form. The answer is a general denial, verified. After hearing the evidence the court instructed a verdict for the plaintiff for the full amount sued for, with interest and attorney’s fees as provided in the note.

There is no controversy but that the note was…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Merchants' National Bank v. Citizens' Gas Light Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1893
  2. Allegheny City v. McClurkan & Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1850
  3. National Spraker Bank v. George C. Treadwell Co.New York Supreme Court · 1894

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Alward v. Broadway Gold Min. Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1933
  2. Union State Bank of Shawnee v. HouselSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1927

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API