Legal Opinion
National Spraker Bank v. George C. Treadwell Co.
New York Supreme Court
Decided July 27, 1894PublishedCited by 5 opinions
Appeal from circuit court, Kings county. Action by the National Spraker Bank of Canajoharie against the George G. Treadwell Company on a promissory note. From a judgment entered on a verdict in favor of plaintiff, and from an order denying a motion for a new trial, defendant appeals. Affirmed.
1Opinion of the CourtDykman, J.
This is an action upon a promissory note, of which the following is a copy:
“Albany, N. Y., March 10,1893.
“Five months after date, we promise to pay to the order of Geo. H. Tread-well five thousand 00/100 dollars, at Hotchkiss & Co.’s Banking House, 31-33 Broadway, New York, without defalcation, for value received.
“$5,000.00/100. Geo. C. Treadwell Co.
“Geo. H. Treadwell, President.”
The note was indorsed by George H. Treadwell and Hotchkiss & Co. The defense consisted of a denial of the making of the note by the company, but that did not signify that the note was not made by the president, but…
2Cited by5 opinions
- Bangs v. National Macaroni Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1897
- Grant v. George C. Treadwell Co.New York Supreme Court · 1894
- Eureka Pub. Co. v. First Nat. Bank of StiglerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
- Grant v. George C. Treadwell Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1896
- Grant v. George C. Treadwell Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1896