Mena v. State

We affirm the final judgments of conviction and sentences under review. The defendant has failed to demonstrate any reversible error in the three contentions he raises on appeal.

*1013First, we are not persuaded that the trial court erred in denying the defendant’s pre-trial motion to suppress the defendant’s statements to the police. The thrust of the contention here appears to be that the police unlawfully entered the defendant’s home to arrest the defendant because the consent the police obtained from his live-in girlfriend to enter the premises was a coerced consent — thereby tainting (a) the…