Legal Opinion

Francois v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided April 16, 2014No. 3D12-2788PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRothenberg, J.

Gerard P. Francois (“the defendant”) appeals his convictions for aggravated battery and misdemeanor battery based on the trial court’s denial of his ore tenus motions for a continuance and for substitution of private counsel for his court-appointed counsel after the jury had been selected and sworn, and he also asks us to find ineffective assistance of his court-appointed counsel on the face of the record. Because we find that the trial court did not abuse its discretion by denying the motion for a continuance to obtain substitute counsel and that the defendant’s court-appointed counsel was…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Franks v. DelawareSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Wheat v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  3. Corzo v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2002
  4. McKay v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1986
  5. Foster v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1997

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Jason Elysse v. the State of FloridaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2025
  2. Wilcox v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2019
  3. Wilcox v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API