Legal Opinion

City of Cleveland v. Heben

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided June 17, 1991No. 58229PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

James D. Sweeney, Judge.

Defendant-appellant, Edward J. Heben, Jr. (“Heben”), appeals the determination of the trial court which found him in contempt of court. For the reasons adduced below, we affirm in part and reverse in part.

A review of the short record before this court, which does not include the affidavits attached to appellant’s brief which were not filed in the present case, reveals that Heben was the attorney of record representing almost one hundred persons who had been arrested for their actions surrounding a pro-life/anti-abortion demonstration in Cleveland, Ohio, on May 20,…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. KilbaneOhio Supreme Court · 1980
  2. State v. ConliffOhio Court of Appeals · 1978
  3. City of Dayton v. MartinOhio Court of Appeals · 1987
  4. State v. TreonOhio Court of Appeals · 1963
  5. Inmont Corp. v. International Printing & Graphic Communications UnionOhio Court of Appeals · 1977

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Cleveland v. BrightOhio Court of Appeals · 2020
  2. Catholic Social Services v. HowardOhio Court of Appeals · 1995
  3. In Re ParkerOhio Court of Appeals · 1995
  4. In re Contempt of HuthOhio Court of Appeals · 2020
  5. State v. SchieweOhio Court of Appeals · 1996

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API