Legal Opinion

State v. Conliff

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided December 28, 1978No. 78AP-401 and 78AP-402PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcCormac, J.

Defendant, the appellant herein, was charged with assault, a violation of R. C. 2903.13(A), and disturbing a lawful meeting, a violation of R. C. 2917.12(A)(1). Not guilty pleas were entered and a jury trial was demanded. On the first day of trial, over the objection of defendant, the charge of disturbing a lawful meeting was amended to a charge of disorderly conduct.

After extensive pretrial motions and hearings, the assault charge came on for a jury trial while at the same time the disorderly conduct charge was tried before the court, a jury trial not being applicable to a minor misdemeanor.…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Cooke v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  2. In Re LittleSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. State v. WilsonOhio Supreme Court · 1975

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. State v. DrakeOhio Court of Appeals · 1991
  2. In Re Lodico, Unpublished Decision (1-18-2005)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2005
  3. State v. BensonOhio Court of Appeals · 1986
  4. Cleveland v. BrightOhio Court of Appeals · 2020
  5. In Re McGintyOhio Court of Appeals · 1986

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API