Legal Opinion

United States v. Salemme

District Court, D. Massachusetts

Decided November 5, 1997No. Cr. 94-10287, 97-10009PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

WOLF, District Judge.

I. Summary

Defendants Robert DeLuca, Stephen Flemmi, and Francis Salemme have each asked the court to appoint counsel for them pursuant to the Criminal Justice Act (“CJA”), 18 U.S.C. § 3006A. Thus, it is necessary for the court to conduct an appropriate inquiry to determine whether each defendant is financially unable to continue to retain counsel privately and, therefore, is eligible for the appointment of counsel at public expense.

As the government recognizes, in the circumstances of this ease, each defendant’s request for the appointment of counsel…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Simmons v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Kastigar v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Libretti v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  4. United States v. KahanSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  5. United States v. Edward T. Smith, Jr.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1991

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. United States v. FlemmiDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2001
  2. United States v. SalemmeDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1998
  3. Commonwealth v. GodwinMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2004
  4. United States v. Joseph KonradCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2013
  5. United States v. ZelenkaDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 1999

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API