Legal Opinion
United States v. Joseph Konrad
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided September 20, 2013No. 12-1393PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
SCIRICA, Circuit Judge.
The Criminal Justice Act requires courts to furnish legal counsel to criminal defendants “financially unable to obtain adequate representation.” 18 U.S.C. § 3006A(a). Joseph Konrad was appointed a federal defender under the Criminal Justice Act (CJA), based on information he provided in a financial disclosure affidavit. At sentencing, the District Court found several discrepancies between Konrad’s pre-sentencing report and his financial disclosure. The court ordered Konrad to show cause that he was financially eligible for appointed counsel. After a…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Blum v. StensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- United States v. Curtis EvansCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1998
- United States of America, and U.S. District Court Western District of New York v. Darnyl ParkerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006
- Barry v. BrowerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1988
- United States v. Clark BracewellCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1978
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- United States v. Anthony BrookinsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2025
- United States v. Rossi Adams, IICourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2021
- United States v. JenkinsDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2015
- Saunders v. Diamond Pharmacy ServicesDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2023
- United States v. GutierrezDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2018
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.