Legal Opinion

United States v. Callanan

District Court, E.D. Missouri

Decided May 8, 1959No. 27761PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WEBER, District Judge.

Lawrence Callanan has filed a Motion to Correct Sentence Under Count I, under Rule 35, F.R.Crim.P., 18 U.S.C., or, in the Alternative under Title 28, § 2255, U.S.C. Said defendant will hereinafter be referred to as Movant.

Movant was convicted in this Court under an Indictment in two counts charging him with conspiracy to extort in the first count and with the substantive offense of extortion in the second count. The Indictment was based upon Title 18, § 1951, U.S.C., known as the Hobbs Act, or the Anti-Racketeering Act.1

Movant was sentenced on July 19, 1954, by the late…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Pinkerton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  2. Bell v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
  3. United States v. HaymanSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
  4. Gore v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  5. United States v. Universal C. I. T. Credit Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1952

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. United States v. TolubDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1960
  2. United States v. AndersonDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1973
  3. United States v. SwiatekDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1986
  4. Callanan v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API