Legal Opinion
State Ex Rel. Burnquist v. Marcks
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided March 18, 1949No. 34,866PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Thomas Gallagher, Justice.
Action by the attorney general, acting for the commissioner of highways, in behalf of the state, to compel defendant, William Marcks, to remove a building constructed by him in 1941 within the boundaries of First avenue as platted in 1880 in the Second Addition to the city of Windom. The property here involved, constituting a part of First avenue as originally platted, was made a part of state trunk highway No. 85 on January 30,1947, by center line and width orders of the commissioner of highways.
No condemnation proceedings were then instituted with reference to…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- The Alexander Co. v. City of OwatonnaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1946
- Village of Newport v. TaylorSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1948
- City of St. Paul v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1895
- W. H. Barber Co. v. City of MinneapolisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1948
- City of Rochester v. North Side CorporationSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1941
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Servando Building Company v. ZimmermanSupreme Court of Florida · 1956
- Halverson v. Village of DeerwoodSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
- Township of Sterling v. GriffinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
- Neill v. HakeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1958
- Wolfson v. City of St. PaulCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1995
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.