Legal Opinion
Murtha v. Continental Opticians, Inc.
Superior Court of Delaware
Decided July 23, 1997No. 96A-02-012-HLAPublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ALFORD, J.
This is the Court’s decision on Appellant’s petition for an award of an attorney’s fee for legal services rendered on appeal from a decision of the Industrial Accident Board (“Board”). For the following reasons, the Court denies the petition for an attorney’s fee.
BACKGROUND
Susan L. Murtha, Employee below — Appellant (“Employee” or “Claimant”), has petitioned the Court for an award of an attorney’s fee pursuant to 19 Del.C. § 2350(f) in connection with her appeal of a Board decision awarding her disfigurement benefits. Employee suffered a knee injury when she was struck by a…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Johnson v. Chrysler CorporationSupreme Court of Delaware · 1965
- Kofron v. Amoco Chemicals Corp.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1982
- Digiacomo v. Board of Public EducationSupreme Court of Delaware · 1986
- Fiorucci v. C. F. Braun & Co.Superior Court of Delaware · 1961
- Pollard v. the Placers, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1997
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Bristor v. Dover DownsSuperior Court of Delaware · 2021
- Foraker v. Amazon.com, Inc.Superior Court of Delaware · 2021
- Holben v. Pepsi Bottling Venture, LLCSuperior Court of Delaware · 2020
- Holben v. Pepsi Bottling Ventures, LLCSuperior Court of Delaware · 2019
- Hoskins v. Amazon.comSuperior Court of Delaware · 2024
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.