Legal Opinion

Young v. Daniel

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided November 16, 1923PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

Judge Moorman

Affirming.

Appellants filed this suit in the Bourbon circuit court, seeking the rescission, of a contract -whereby they had purchased from appellees a lease on a coal mine with the equipment thereat for $2,000.00. The ground for the re-fief asked was-that' appellants were infants at the time the contract was made. Before trial they became of age and filed amended petitions' adopting the averments, of the original petition and asking judgment against appellees for the $2,000.00 paid under the contract.

Appellees denied that appellants were infants at the time…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. County Board of Education v. HensleyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1912
  2. Asher v. BennettCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1911
  3. Schmitheimer v. EisemanCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1870
  4. Smith v. ColeCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1912

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Pinnacle Motor Company v. DaughertyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1929
  2. Baisden v. GibsonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1925
  3. Conrad v. MartinCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1925
  4. Hart v. DavidsonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1938
  5. Mitchell v. SwartzCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1925

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API