Legal Opinion

Smith v. Cole

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided May 2, 1912PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from Knott Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion op the Court by

Judge Carroll —

Affirming.

The appellant, Adam Smith, claiming to be the owner and in the possession of a described tract of land, brought this suit against the appellees, Cole 'and Crane, to recover damages for trespass committed by them upon his premises in branding and attempting to convert trees.

The appellees, 'after controverting in their answer the petition, set up that the appellant had sold and conveyed to them the trees that he alleged they were about to appropriate. For reply, the appellant averred that if he did sell the trees, he was an infant under twenty-one…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. County Board of Education v. HensleyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1912

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. New Domain Oil & Gas Co. v. McKinneyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1920
  2. Looney v. Elkhorn Land & Improvement Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1922
  3. Adkins v. AdkinsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1919
  4. Turner v. StewartCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1912
  5. Young v. DanielCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1923

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API