Legal Opinion

Witt v. State

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided June 12, 2007No. 45S00-0608-CR-283PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SULLIVAN, Justice.

An individual who pleads guilty where the issue of sentencing is left to the trial court’s discretion must challenge that sentence, if at all, in a direct appeal. When the time for appeal has expired, Post- Conviction Rule 2 permits such an individual to request permission to file a belated notice of appeal. But the grant of such permission is not automatic. In this case, Darren Witt did not meet the Rule’s requirement that he demonstrate by a preponderance of the evidence that he had been diligent in requesting permission to file a belated notice of appeal.

Background

In…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  2. Tumulty v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Collins v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2004
  4. Gutermuth v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2006

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Moshenek v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Sholes v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2008
  3. Witt v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2010
  4. Graham v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2009
  5. Reid v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2008

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API