Legal Opinion

Sigel-Campion Live Stock Commission Co. v. Ardohain

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided May 1, 1922No. 10,094PublishedCited by 17 opinions

Action to recover for sheep alleged to have been sold plaintiff in error. Judgment for plaintiff. Error to the District Court of the City and County of Denver, Hon. Charles C. Butler, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Burke

*411Defendant in error Ardohain brought suit against plaintiff in error (hereinafter referred to as “the company”) and defendant in error Emerson, for $7784 and interest as the purchase price of certain sheep alleged to have been sold by Ardohain and shipped from California and which, upon arrival in Denver, it was said the company wrongfully refused to receive or pay for. By replication Ardohain admitted that these sheep were later sold in Omaha for $5126.85, hence reduced his demand for $2637.65 and interest, a total' of $2987.65, for which amount an instructed verdict was returned. To review…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Merchants' National Bank v. Nichols & Shepard Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1906
  2. Columbia Mill Co. v. National Bank of CommerceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1893

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Rush Creek Solutions, Inc. v. Ute Mountain Ute TribeColorado Court of Appeals · 2004
  2. Moore v. SwitzerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1925
  3. Chamberlain v. the Amalgamated Sugar Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1926
  4. Berryhill v. EllettCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1933
  5. In Re the Marriage of RobbinsColorado Court of Appeals · 2000

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API