UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, — v. BILLIE JEROME ALLEN, —
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
1Concurring in part, dissenting in partHansen, Circuit Judge
I agree with the court’s conclusion that, in light of Ring, the indictment in this case was defective because it did not charge at least one statutory aggravating factor. Ante at 748-751. Further, I agree with the court’s conclusion that this defect does not require automatic reversal and must be analyzed for harmless error, that is, error which did not affect Allen’s substantial rights by prejudicing the outcome of the district court proceedings against him. Ante at 751-753. However, I disagree with the court’s conclusion that the failure to submit one or more statutory aggrava-tors to the…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- United States v. CalandraSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- United States v. MechanikSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Wood v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- United States v. MatthewsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2002
- United States of America, Cross-Appellant/appellee v. James Randall Sanders, Appellant/cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2003
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.