Legal Opinion

Hinkle v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 21, 2002PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

Judge SIMPSON.

John Hinkle (Claimant) appeals from the decision of the Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board (Board) that affirmed the decision of the Workers’ Compensation Judge (WCJ) terminating his benefits. We are asked to consider whether the WCJ erred in twice amending Claimant’s challenge petition, and whether the termination of benefits is supported by substantial unequivocal medical evidence. For the reasons that follow, we affirm.

Claimant suffered a work-related injury in September 1994 while working for General Electric Company (Employer) as a welder. Employer issued a notice…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Universal Cyclops Steel Corp. v. KrawczynskiCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  2. Udvari v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
  3. Mearion v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
  4. Dobransky v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
  5. Canavan v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2001

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. 3D Trucking v. Wcab (Fine and Anthony)Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  2. Wheeler v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  3. Shapiro v. State Board of AccountancyCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
  4. 3d Trucking Co. v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  5. Brown v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2004

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API