Legal Opinion
Dobransky v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
Decided September 8, 1997PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PELLEGRINI, Judge.
Erie Dobransky (Claimant) petitions for review of the November 7,1996 decision and order of the Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board (Board) affirming the decision of a Workers’ Compensation Judge (WCJ) suspending Claimant’s benefits because Claimant was physically able to return to work. Not disputing on appeal the WCJ’s determination that he is physically able to return to his pre-injury position, Claimant appeals, contending only that the jobs offered to him were not available because he was living in Pittsburgh and they were offered in Philadelphia.
The facts as found by…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Estate of McGovern v. Commonwealth, State Employees' Retirement BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
- DeMarco v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
- Smith v. Commonwealth, Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
- Williams v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
3Cited by12 opinions
- Rox Coal Co. v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
- 3D Trucking v. Wcab (Fine and Anthony)Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
- 3d Trucking Co. v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
- Mearion v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
- Hinkle v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.