Legal Opinion

State v. Albert

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided June 18, 1986No. 85-841-K; A35467; 84-7311-K; A35468Published

1Opinion of the CourtYoung, J.

In these consolidated cases, the state appeals separate orders of the trial court dismissing charges of driving while suspended (DWS). Former ORS 487.560.1 The trial court held, purportedly pursuant to State v. Tooley, 297 Or 602, 687 P2d 1068 (1984), that, when a driver’s license is to be suspended, due process requires that the licensee be given notice of and opportunity for a presuspension hearing. Concluding that defendants were not given either notice or opportunity, the court dismissed the charges. We reverse.

Defendants received orders of suspension from the Motor Vehicles Division…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. TooleyOregon Supreme Court · 1984
  2. State v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1985
  3. State v. CowieCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API