Legal Opinion

Griffin v. Planters Chemical Corporation

District Court, D. South Carolina

Decided July 30, 1969No. Civ. A. 68-170, 68-171PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

HEMPHILL, District Judge.

These actions seek recovery (1) for injuries allegedly suffered by the deceased, and kept alive by the survival statute 1 and (2) for the wrongful death of deceased. 2 They were consolidated for trial and tried before the court without a jury. Plaintiff complains of negligence, carelessness and willfulness on the part of defendant as the proximate cause of the (1) pain and suffering to, and (2) death of, plaintiff’s intestate, asks actual and punitive damages. Defendant, in each case pleads a general denial by answer. At the trial defendant moved to interpose the…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Hubbard-Hall Chemical Company v. Charles L. Silverman, AdministratorCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1965
  3. McClanahan v. California Spray-Chemical Corp.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1953
  4. Brooks v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 1967
  5. Odom v. Ford Motor CompanySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1956

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Riordan v. W. J. Bremer, Inc.District Court, S.D. Georgia · 1979
  2. Kirschner v. Process Design Associates, IncMichigan Supreme Court · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API