Kirschner v. Process Design Associates, Inc
Michigan Supreme Court
1ConcurrenceKelly, J.
I concur in the result reached by the majority. However I write separately to express my view concerning future actions. I would hold that, in future cases where an insurer defends under a reservation of rights, it must promptly notify both the court and the other parties of its intention. Also, I would favor the imposition of a court rule to that effect, in accordance with the procedures outlined in MCR 1.201.
The rationale behind the requirement is twofold: First, notification to the court is a simple courtesy and would promote efficient use of judicial resources and more fully inform the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Appell v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1964
- Allstate Insurance v. MangerNew York Supreme Court · 1961
- Fellows v. MauserDistrict Court, D. Vermont · 1969
- Griffin v. Planters Chemical CorporationDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 1969