deRochemont v. United States
United States Court of Claims
1Opinion of the Court
SHOW CAUSE ORDER
TURNER, Judge.
For reasons set forth below, the court, sua sponte, directs plaintiff to show cause why his claim for refunds totalling $6294.381 and interest thereon should not be forfeited to the United States pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2514.
By separate opinion and order filed this day (incorporated herein by reference), we concluded that deRochemont’s request for a refund of an alleged $2666 overpayment in his 1979 individual income tax was barred under 26 U.S.C. § 7422. We further concluded that the IRS lacked authority to recoup the fraudulently induced $5015.62 D & L Fleck…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Miller v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1977
- Little v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1957
- Kamen Soap Products Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1954
- Standard Oil Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Standard Oil Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1942
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- American Heritage Bancorp v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2004
- GULF GROUP GENERAL ENTERPRISES CO. W.L.L., Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES, DefendantUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2013
- Farkas v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2003
- Chapman Law Firm, LPA v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2013
- Robert M. Heger v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2013
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.