Legal Opinion

deRochemont v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided May 10, 1991No. 391-89 TPublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SHOW CAUSE ORDER

TURNER, Judge.

For reasons set forth below, the court, sua sponte, directs plaintiff to show cause why his claim for refunds totalling $6294.381 and interest thereon should not be forfeited to the United States pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2514.

By separate opinion and order filed this day (incorporated herein by reference), we concluded that deRochemont’s request for a refund of an alleged $2666 overpayment in his 1979 individual income tax was barred under 26 U.S.C. § 7422. We further concluded that the IRS lacked authority to recoup the fraudulently induced $5015.62 D & L Fleck…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Miller v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1977
  2. Little v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1957
  3. Kamen Soap Products Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1954
  4. Standard Oil Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  5. Standard Oil Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1942

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. American Heritage Bancorp v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2004
  2. GULF GROUP GENERAL ENTERPRISES CO. W.L.L., Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES, DefendantUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2013
  3. Farkas v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2003
  4. Chapman Law Firm, LPA v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2013
  5. Robert M. Heger v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2013

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API