Pannone v. John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance
Supreme Court of Rhode Island
1Opinion of the CourtHahn, J.
This is an action of assumpsit to recover disability benefits under a contract supplementary to a life insurance policy issued to the plaintiff by the defendant company. The case was tried in the Superior Court by a justice sitting without a jury and decision was rendered for the plaintiff in the sum of $500. The case is before us on defendant’s exceptions to the decision.
The defendant, an insurance corporation, issued to the plaintiff an endowment policy of insurance in the sum of $10,000. Attached to and forming a part of this policy is a supplementary contract, described as a “Disability…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Cato v. Ætna Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1927
- Lee v. New York Life InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1924
- Graves v. Knights of the MacCabees of the WorldNew York Court of Appeals · 1910
- Coad v. Travelers' InsuranceNebraska Supreme Court · 1901
3Cited by7 opinions
- Janney v. Scranton Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
- Cantor v. Metropolitan L. Ins. Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
- Seabra v. PURITAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANYSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1977
- Bubany v. New York Life Ins. Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1935
- Mutual Life Ins. v. FrostCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1947
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.