Legal Opinion

Pannone v. John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance

Supreme Court of Rhode Island

Decided December 31, 1931PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHahn, J.

This is an action of assumpsit to recover disability benefits under a contract supplementary to a life insurance policy issued to the plaintiff by the defendant company. The case was tried in the Superior Court by a justice sitting without a jury and decision was rendered for the plaintiff in the sum of $500. The case is before us on defendant’s exceptions to the decision.

The defendant, an insurance corporation, issued to the plaintiff an endowment policy of insurance in the sum of $10,000. Attached to and forming a part of this policy is a supplementary contract, described as a “Disability…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Cato v. Ætna Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1927
  2. Lee v. New York Life InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1924
  3. Graves v. Knights of the MacCabees of the WorldNew York Court of Appeals · 1910
  4. Coad v. Travelers' InsuranceNebraska Supreme Court · 1901

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Janney v. Scranton Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
  2. Cantor v. Metropolitan L. Ins. Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
  3. Seabra v. PURITAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANYSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1977
  4. Bubany v. New York Life Ins. Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1935
  5. Mutual Life Ins. v. FrostCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1947

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API