Lee v. New York Life Insurance
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtHoke, C. J.
Under a correct and comprehensive charge, in which the positions of the respective parties and the pertinent evidence were fully and fairly stated, the jury has rendered its verdict for plaintiff, and we find no reason for disturbing the results of the trial. On the determinative question as contained and presented in the issue, the court, among Other things, charged the jury as follows:
“Now, you will want to know what is meant by the language in the contract ‘wholly incapacitated and thereby permanently and continuously prevented from engaging in any avocation whatsoever for remuneration or…
2Cited by15 opinions
- Thigpen v. Jefferson Standard Life InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1933
- Cooper v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
- Bulluck v. Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1931
- Mitchell v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United StatesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1934
- Smith v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United StatesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1933
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.