Legal Opinion
State v. Carlson
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided April 5, 1968No. 40387PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Murphy, Justice.
This is an appeal from a judgment of conviction in a criminal case in which it is asserted that statements of defendant made to police during the course of their investigation were involuntarily given and induced by fear and that the court erred in permitting the introduction in evidence of such statements. It is further asserted that the evidence presented did not warrant a verdict of guilty on the charge stated in the information.
The information charged defendant with having, on September 11, 1965, aided and conspired with others in committing the offense of armed robbery.…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Malloy v. HoganSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Johnson v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Haynes v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Lynumn v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- State v. SmithSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1972
- State v. DamlSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1968
- City of Barnum v. SabriCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2003