In re Special Grand Jury Investigation
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtSadler, J.
{¶ 1} Appellants, a rehabilitation and nursing center ("rehabilitation center") and its parent organization, 1 appeal an entry of the Franklin County Court of Common Pleas ordering production of documents alleged by appellants to be protected under the work-product doctrine. Because appellants have not argued or affirmatively established that an immediate appeal is necessary in order to afford a meaningful and effective remedy under R.C. 2505.02(B)(4)(b), we dismiss the appeal for lack of a final, appealable order pursuant to Smith v. Chen , 142 Ohio St.3d 411 , 2015-Ohio-1480 , 31 N.E.3d 633…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Smith v. ChenOhio Supreme Court · 2015
- Burnham v. Cleveland Clinic (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2016
- State ex rel. Board of State Teachers Retirement System v. DavisOhio Supreme Court · 2007
- In Re Grand Jury Proceeding of John DoeOhio Supreme Court · 2016
- Bowers v. CravenOhio Court of Appeals · 2012
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- DMS Constr. Ents., L.L.C. v. HomickOhio Court of Appeals · 2020
- Karr v. SalidoOhio Court of Appeals · 2022
- Dineen v. PelfreyOhio Court of Appeals · 2022
- Drummond v. State Farm Mut. Auto Ins. Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2023
- Columbus City School Dist. v. StateOhio Court of Appeals · 2024
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.