In Re Grand Jury Proceeding of John Doe
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtLanzinger, J.
{¶ 1} In this case, we are asked to determine whether an order denying a motion to quash a grand-jury subpoena and ordering a party to testify or produce documents is a final order that may be appealed. We hold that it is.
*399I. Case Background
{¶ 2} During the course of grand-jury proceedings, the state of Ohio1 issued eight grand-jury subpoenas to individuals associated with appellants, an Ohio limited partnership and the president of its general partner.2 Appellants moved to quash the subpoenas, which sought documents and testimony, arguing that they required appellants and their former…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- United States v. CalandraSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- State v. MuncieOhio Supreme Court · 2001
- Polikoff v. AdamOhio Supreme Court · 1993
- Burnham v. Cleveland Clinic (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2016
- Bernbaum v. SilversteinOhio Supreme Court · 1980
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- State ex rel. Thomas v. McGinty (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2020
- DMS Constr. Ents., L.L.C. v. HomickOhio Court of Appeals · 2020
- Godwin v. Facebook, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2020
- In re Special Grand Jury InvestigationOhio Court of Appeals · 2018
- State ex rel. Ctr. for Media & Democracy v. YostOhio Supreme Court · 2024
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.