Legal Opinion

Smith v. Chen

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided April 21, 2015No. 2013-2008PublishedCited by 48 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtO’Neill, J.

{¶ 1} This is an appeal from a judgment affirming a trial court’s order compelling discovery of attorney work product. For the reasons that follow, we vacate the judgment of the court of appeals because it lacked jurisdiction. Appellants did not establish that the trial court order compelling discovery was a final, appealable order, and neither this court nor the court of appeals has jurisdiction to consider the merits of an interlocutory order that is not final and appealable.

Facts and Procedural History

{¶ 2} Plaintiff-appellee, Henry Smith, sued defendants-appellants, Dr. Ying Chen, D.O.,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. CitiMortgage, Inc. v. Roznowski (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2014
  2. Smith v. ChenOhio Court of Appeals · 2013

3Cited by48 opinions

  1. Burnham v. Cleveland Clinic (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2016
  2. State v. Glenn (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2021
  3. DMS Constr. Ents., L.L.C. v. HomickOhio Court of Appeals · 2020
  4. State v. DowlerOhio Court of Appeals · 2015
  5. State v. CutrightOhio Court of Appeals · 2021

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API