Legal Opinion
People v. Watts
California Court of Appeal
Decided November 23, 1999No. A083194PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
STEIN, J.
A jury found that Mango Watts had committed second degree robberies of Eva Birrueta and Christina Gulutz (Pen. Code, § 211), attempted second degree robberies of Cheryl Bishop and Sonia Marin (Pen. Code, §§211, 664) and assault with a firearm against all four women (Pen. Code, § 245, subd. (a)(2)). The jury further found true allegations that Watts had been armed with a firearm during the commission of all the offenses (Pen. Code, § 12022, subd. (a)(1)), and that Watts personally had used a firearm in committing the offenses against Cheryl Bishop (Pen. Code, §§ 1203.06, subd.…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Standefer v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- People v. LucasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
- People v. SamayoaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
- People v. JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989
- People v. LatimerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- People v. SuffCalifornia Supreme Court · 2014
- Consolidated Irrigation District v. City of SelmaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
- Jonathan C. Shaw v. Cal TerhuneCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- State v. PearceIdaho Supreme Court · 2008
- Jonathan C. Shaw v. Cal TerhuneCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.