Legal Opinion
Jonathan C. Shaw v. Cal Terhune
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided August 10, 2004No. 02-16829PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER AND AMENDED OPINION
ORDER
The opinion filed December 22, 2003, is hereby amended and the dissent shall be withdrawn. The Clerk shall file the attached amended opinion.
With the filing of this opinion, the panel has voted to deny appellant’s petition for panel rehearing. Judge O’Scannlain has voted to deny the petition for rehearing en banc and Judges Wallace and Hall have recommended denial. The full court has been advised of the petition for rehearing en banc and no judge has requested a vote on whether to rehear the matter en banc. Fed. R.App. P. 35.
The petition for panel rehearing and…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Brecht v. AbrahamsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Lockyer v. AndradeSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- Donnelly v. DeChristoforoSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Tuan Van Tran v. Gary Lindsey, Warden Salinas Valley State Prisons State of CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Amos Dwayne Stevenson v. Gail Lewis, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- Commonwealth v. HousenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2011
- Stephen Deck v. Mack JenkinsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- Hoover v. CareyDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2007
- Noguera v. DavisDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2017
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.