Myer v. Miller

BROWN, Justice.

Appellees brought this action in the trial court to recover monies paid appellants pursuant to a purchase contract on the theory that the business purchased had a net worth substantially less than represented. Appellants counter by claiming appellee Laurel Miller breached a fiduciary duty to appellants. The issues on appeal are:

1. Did appellee Laurel Miller owe a fidu-clary duty to appellants?

2. Did appellee Laurel Miller breach a fiduciary duty?

83. Did the trial court commit reversible error when it stated in its findings of fact that the "contract constituted an accord and…