Ferguson v. Ferguson
Wyoming Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
THOMAS, Justice.
The primary legal problem in this case is whether the district court was justified in entering a partial summary judgment against a cotenant on the ground that as a matter of law the record foreclosed his claim of adverse possession against the other cotenants, a brother and a sister. The other issues in the case then were tried to the court, and claims of error are assert-. ed charging that the trial court should not have granted a motion to strike the appel-. lant’s jury demand and that the judgment of the trial court was opposite from what it should have been according to…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Anderson v. BauerWyoming Supreme Court · 1984
- Hurst v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1985
- City of Rock Springs v. SturmWyoming Supreme Court · 1929
- Holly Sugar Corp. v. FritzlerWyoming Supreme Court · 1931
- True v. Hi-Plains Elevator MacHinery, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1978
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Goss v. GossWyoming Supreme Court · 1989
- Mile High Industries v. CohenCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2000
- Braunstein v. Robinson Family Ltd. Partnership LLPWyoming Supreme Court · 2010
- Estate of Weeks v. Weeks-RohnerWyoming Supreme Court · 2018
- Milton v. MitchellWyoming Supreme Court · 1988
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.