Legal Opinion

Ferguson v. Ferguson

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided July 9, 1987No. 86-160PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THOMAS, Justice.

The primary legal problem in this case is whether the district court was justified in entering a partial summary judgment against a cotenant on the ground that as a matter of law the record foreclosed his claim of adverse possession against the other cotenants, a brother and a sister. The other issues in the case then were tried to the court, and claims of error are assert-. ed charging that the trial court should not have granted a motion to strike the appel-. lant’s jury demand and that the judgment of the trial court was opposite from what it should have been according to…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Anderson v. BauerWyoming Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Hurst v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1985
  3. City of Rock Springs v. SturmWyoming Supreme Court · 1929
  4. Holly Sugar Corp. v. FritzlerWyoming Supreme Court · 1931
  5. True v. Hi-Plains Elevator MacHinery, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1978

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Goss v. GossWyoming Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Mile High Industries v. CohenCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2000
  3. Braunstein v. Robinson Family Ltd. Partnership LLPWyoming Supreme Court · 2010
  4. Estate of Weeks v. Weeks-RohnerWyoming Supreme Court · 2018
  5. Milton v. MitchellWyoming Supreme Court · 1988

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API