Legal Opinion

Moncrief v. Williston Basin Interstate Pipeline Co.

District Court, D. Wyoming

Decided March 10, 1995No. 1:93-cv-01045PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER ON MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

BRIMMER, District Judge.

The above-entitled matter having come before the Court upon the parties’ motions for summary judgment and briefs in support of and in opposition thereto, and the Court having reviewed the materials on file herein, having heard argument from the parties, and being fully advised in the premises, FINDS and ORDERS as follows:

Background

This ease arises out of a dispute regarding the terms of a contract between the plaintiffs father, W.A. Moncrief, and the defendants, Williston Basin Interstate Pipeline Company (WBIPC) and Montana Dakota…

2Cases cited68 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Energy Reserves Group, Inc. v. Kansas Power & Light Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. Crandon v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  5. Twin-Lick Oil Co. v. MarburySupreme Court of the United States · 1876

63 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. United States v. Winstar Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
  2. Moncrief v. Williston Basin Interstate Pipeline Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1999
  3. American Suzuki Motor Corp. v. Bill Kummer, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1995
  4. Sawyer v. GuthrieDistrict Court, D. Wyoming · 2002
  5. United States v. Winstar Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API