Legal Opinion
State v. Boynton
Hawaii Supreme Court
Decided January 24, 1978No. 5912, 5913PublishedCited by 38 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT BY
OGATA, J.
Each of the defendants-appellees Lucinda Boynton and Andy Utsal (hereinafter appellees) had been charged in two separate three-count indictments returned by the Maui Grand Jury for the alleged offenses of promoting detrimental drugs in the second degree in violation of Sec. 712-1248(1) (c) 1 of the Hawaii Revised Statutes, promoting a harmful drug in the third degree in violation of Sec. 712-1246(1) 2 of the Hawaii Revised Statutes, and promoting a dangerous drug in the third degree in violation of Sec. 712-1243(1) 3 of the Hawaii Revised Statutes. On February…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Boyd v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- United States v. John A. KramerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1983
- State v. LopezHawaii Supreme Court · 1995
- State v. MelearHawaii Supreme Court · 1981
- State v. PattioayHawaii Supreme Court · 1995
- State v. LocquiaoHawaii Supreme Court · 2002
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.