Nickell v. Gonzalez
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtDoan, P.J.
I
This action was originally commenced by plaintiffs-appellants-cross-appellees Donna and Ruby Nickell (“Nickells”) in an effort to recover for injuries allegedly resulting from a surgical procedure performed on Donna Nickell by defendant-appellee-cross-appellant Dr. Luis Gonzales (“Dr. Gonzalez”). Dr. Gonzalez admitted that he performed a surgical procedure on Mrs. Nickell, specifically a resection of her left first rib and division of the scalene muscle, in order to relieve what is known as a thoracic outlet syndrome, an occasional numbness and/or tingling of the arm. Dr. Gonzalez further…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Nolan v. NolanOhio Supreme Court · 1984
- Whitaker-Merrell Co. v. Carl M. Geupel Construction Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1972
- State ex rel. Potain v. MathewsOhio Supreme Court · 1979
- Nickell v. GonzalezOhio Supreme Court · 1985
- Alexander v. Buckeye Pipe Line Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1977
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Eysoldt v. ProScan ImagingOhio Court of Appeals · 2011
- Whiston v. Bio-Lab, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1993
- McCarthy v. Sterling Chems., Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2012
- Crawford v. Sylvania Marketplace Co.Lucas County Court of Common Pleas · 1995
- Estate of Mikulski v. Centerior Energy Corp.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2025
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.