Donley v. City of Mountain Brook
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
ADAMS, Justice.
Michael Erin Donley (defendant) petitions this court to review the decision of the Court of Criminal Appeals which affirmed his conviction for making harassing telephone calls in violation of Code 1975, § 13A-ll-8(b)(l)(b). We granted certiora-ri to review the issue of whether the prosecution proved defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. The Court of Criminal Appeals, 429 So.2d 603, concluded it did. We conclude it did not, and we reverse and remand.
The opinion of the Court of Criminal Appeals sets out the procedural and substantive facts of this case. In summary, the…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Young v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1969
- Morton v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1976
- Randolph v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1893
- Stewart v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1981
- Wade v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1931
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- McKillop v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1993
- Tulley v. City of JacksonvilleSupreme Court of Alabama · 2015