Legal Opinion
Pawl Washeleski v. Golnesa Monazamfar, et al.
District Court, N.D. California
Decided December 8, 2025No. 5:25-cv-03135Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 PAWL WASHELESKI, Case No. 25-cv-03135-EKL 8 Plaintiff, ORDER SCREENING COMPLAINT, 9 v. DENYING MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION, AND 10 GOLNESA MONAZAMFAR, et al., RESOLVING PENDING MOTIONS 11 Defendants. Dkt. Nos. 11, 12, 26, 74, 75, 105, 106, 107 12 13 Self-represented Plaintiff Pawl Washeleski filed this action and an application to proceed 14 in forma pauperis. See ECF No. 1 (“Complaint”), No. 2 (“IFP Application”). The Court granted 15 Washeleski’s IFP Application. ECF No. 104. In this Order, the Court screens…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- West v. AtkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Winter v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2008
- Polk County v. DodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.