Legal Opinion
Stanley v. Sherwin-Williams Co.
District Court, W.D. Virginia
Decided June 21, 1993No. Civ. A. 92-0091-APublishedCited by 32 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
WILSON, District Judge.
This is an action by plaintiff James Stanley against the Sherwin-Williams Company for interference with contractual relations. Stanley is a Virginia resident and Sherwin-Williams is an Ohio corporation with its principal place of business in that state, and there is more than $50,000 in controversy exclusive of interest and costs. Accordingly, there is diversity jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1332. The court finds that Stanley was required, but failed, to schedule his claim against Sherwin-Williams as a contingent asset in his personal bankruptcy…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Ed Vreugdenhill, D/B/A Menning Implement v. Navistar International Transportation Corporation, Formerly International Harvester CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1991
- In Re WebbCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1932
- Pace v. Battley (In Re Pace)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- In Re FullerUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 1992
3Cited by32 opinions
- Lamont Wilson v. Dollar General CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2013
- In the Matter of Edward Richman Ilene Richman, Debtors. Edward Richman Ilene Richman v. First Woman's BankCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1997
- Woods v. KenanCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1999
- Rowland v. Novus Financial Corp.District Court, D. Hawaii · 1996
- In Re SheltonUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Virginia · 1996
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.