Legal Opinion

Ed Vreugdenhill, D/B/A Menning Implement v. Navistar International Transportation Corporation, Formerly International Harvester Company

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided November 29, 1991No. 91-1654PublishedCited by 88 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ALSOP, Chief Judge.

This case arises out of plaintiff-appellant’s suit for damages against defendant-appellee for failure to accept returned parts in violation of South Dakota law. Ed Vreugdenhill, a former International Harvester dealer in equipment and parts, appeals the district court’s 1 grant of summary judgment in favor of Navistar International Transportation Corporation, formerly International Harvester Company (“IHC”). We affirm.

In January 1983, Vreugdenhill entered Chapter 11 bankruptcy proceedings and scheduled approximately $500,000 in property, including the parts which he…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Vette Company and Kansas City Boneless Beef, Inc. v. The Aetna Casualty & Surety CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1980
  2. Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 98,209 Arthur L. Stokes v. Lawrence Lokken and Henson & Tully, a PartnershipCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1981

3Cited by88 opinions

  1. Parker v. Wendy's International, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2004
  2. Jeffrey and Jeffrey v. DesmondCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1995
  3. Cusano v. KleinCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
  4. Rosenshein v. KlebanDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1996
  5. In Re KaneCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2010

83 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API