Legal Opinion
Pearson v. Firstenergy Corp. Pension Plan
District Court, N.D. Ohio
Decided December 31, 2014No. Case No. 5:14CV634PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
SARA LIOI, District Judge.
Plaintiff Marc Pearson (“plaintiff’ or “Pearson”) brought this action under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (“ERISA”) against defendant First-Energy Corp. Pension Plan (“the Plan”) and defendant FirstEnergy Corp. Retirement Board, Plan Administrator (“the Plan Fiduciary”), asserting that he was improperly denied pension benefits. In his complaint, plaintiff raises three claims: (1) a denial of benefits claim, under 29 U.S.C. § 1132; (2) a breach of fiduciary duty claim, also under 29 U.S.C. § 1132; and (3) a refusal to provide information…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Varity Corp. v. HoweSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Tackett v. M & G POLYMERS, USA, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2009
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Beltway Paving Company, Inc. v. Prudential Insurance Company of AmericaDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2022
- NSK Industries, Inc. v. Tekmart Integrated Manufacturing Services LimitedDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2024