Echorst v. Kaim
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the CourtRose, J.
Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court (Monserrate, J.), entered July 28, 2000 in Broome County, which granted a motion by defendants Ralph Barton and Wendy Glazier for summary judgment dismissing the complaint against them.
*596Plaintiff Samuel R. Echorst (hereinafter the child) rode his bicycle on a public sidewalk into the side of a car exiting a driveway on property owned by defendants Ralph Barton and Wendy Glazier (hereinafter collectively referred to as defendants). The presence of a 48-inch-high fence along defendants’ property line allegedly contributed to the accident by obstructing…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Pulka v. EdelmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
- Hamilton v. Beretta U.S.A. Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 2001
- Eiseman v. StateNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
- 532 Madison Avenue Gourmet Foods, Inc. v. Finlandia Center, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 2001
- Hayes v. MalkanNew York Court of Appeals · 1970
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Sheila C. v. PovichAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- Cook v. SuitorAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- Adorno v. John T. Adorno, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 2007
- Bates v. ConstableNew York Supreme Court · 2004
- COOK, KAREN v. SUITOR, ILEANEAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.