Legal Opinion · Dissent

Epstein v. Scally

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided February 16, 1984Published

1DissentSullivan, J.

In denying plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment in lieu of a complaint on a $16,000 promissory note, Special Term found that defendant’s claim of fraud in the inducement presented an issue of fact. I disagree and would grant plaintiff summary judgment. Defendant, a doctor, purchased the medical practice of Emanuel Z. Epstein, the deceased, from plaintiff, the executor of his estate, for $24,000, of which $8,000 was paid on September 16, 1982, the date of sale, with the balance of $16,000, as evidenced by a note in that amount executed by defendant in plaintiff’s favor, payable in 12 equal…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Danann Realty Corp. v. HarrisNew York Court of Appeals · 1959
  2. Bridger v. . GoldsmithNew York Court of Appeals · 1894
  3. Jackson v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1924
  4. Angerosa v. White Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1936
  5. Jackson v. StateNew York Court of Appeals · 1925

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API