Legal Opinion
McKinnon v. International Fidelity Insurance
New York Supreme Court
Decided October 8, 1999PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Barry A. Cozier, J.
Defendant International Fidelity Insurance Company (IFIC) moves, pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a) (7), to dismiss the complaint for failure to state a cause of action.
FACTUAL ALLEGATIONS
Plaintiff Belinda G. McKinnon brings this class action on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated, against IFIC and two of its agents, Montgomery Carlin and David Morgan, alleging that defendants charged McKinnon excessive and unlawful fees on bail bonds. McKinnon alleges that the defendants routinely charge and receive fees of at least 10 to *51915% of the total bail…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Lama Holding Co. v. Smith Barney Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1996
- Burns Jackson Miller Summit & Spitzer v. LindnerNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
- Rocanova v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of United StatesNew York Court of Appeals · 1994
- Sheehy v. Big Flats Community Day, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1989
- Brian Hoxie's Painting Co. v. Cato-Meridian Central School DistrictNew York Court of Appeals · 1990
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Gibbons v. DeWitt Stern Group, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001