Legal Opinion

Lee v. Dynamex, Inc.

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 26, 2008No. B196235PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

PERLUSS, P. J.

Charles Lee filed a putative class action lawsuit on his own behalf and on behalf of all similarly situated drivers for Dynamex, Inc., a parcel delivery company, alleging Dynamex had improperly reclassified the drivers from employees to independent contractors in violation of California law. After first denying Lee’s motion to compel Dynamex to identify and provide contact information for potential putative class members, the trial court denied Lee’s motion for class certification. Because the trial court’s discovery mling directly conflicts with the Supreme Court’s…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Waller v. Truck Insurance Exchange, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Hill v. National Collegiate Athletic Assn.California Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Vasquez v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  4. Daar v. Yellow Cab Co.California Supreme Court · 1967
  5. Evangelatos v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Dynamex Operations W., Inc. v. Superior Court of L. A. Cnty.California Supreme Court · 2018
  2. Williams v. Superior Court of L. A. Cnty.California Supreme Court · 2017
  3. Ghazaryan v. Diva Limousine, Ltd.California Court of Appeal · 2008
  4. County of Los Angeles v. Los Angeles County Employee Relations CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 2013
  5. SEVIDAL v. Target Corp.California Court of Appeal · 2010

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API