Legal Opinion
SEVIDAL v. Target Corp.
California Court of Appeal
Decided October 29, 2010No. D056206PublishedCited by 32 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
HALLER, J.
After purchasing three clothing items from Target Corporation’s Web site that were misidentified as made in the United States, Raymundo B. Sevidal brought a class action against Target, alleging fraud and violation of unfair competition and false advertising laws, and seeking injunctive and restitutionary relief. Sevidal then moved to certify a class of California consumers who bought imported items from Target’s Web site that were similarly misidentified. Sevidal argued that under the California Supreme Court’s recent decision in In re Tobacco II Cases (2009) 46 Cal.4th 298…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- In Re Tobacco II CasesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2009
- Linder v. Thrifty Oil Co.California Supreme Court · 2000
- Sav-On Drug Stores, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
- Durell v. Sharp HealthcareCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
- Californians for Disability Rights v. Mervyn's, LLCCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- In re Conagra Foods, Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2014
- In re Tobacco Cases IICalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
- People v. JTH Tax, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2013
- Webb v. Carter's Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2011
- In re NJOY, Inc. Consumer Class Action LitigationDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2015
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.