Legal Opinion

Joo Leong Tan v. Goddard

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 3, 1993No. B058584PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

EPSTEIN, J.

In this case, we apply Knight v. Jewett (1992) 3 Cal.4th 296 [11 Cal.Rptr.2d, 834 P.2d 696] and conclude that the trial court erred in granting summary judgment against appellant on the now rejected doctrine of implied reasonable assumption of the risk.

Factual and Procedural Summary

Since this case reaches us after a full grant of summary judgment against the appellant, we review the moving and opposing papers to determine whether respondent had succeeded in negating at least one essential element in each of appellant’s causes of action, or otherwise had established an…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Nga Li v. Yellow Cab Co.California Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Knight v. JewettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Stationers Corp. v. Dun & Bradstreet, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1965
  4. Murphy v. Steeplechase Amusement Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1929
  5. Ford v. GouinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Kahn v. East Side Union High School DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Parsons v. Crown Disposal Co.California Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Ferrari v. Grand Canyon DoriesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
  4. Record v. ReasonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
  5. Allan v. Snow Summit, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1996

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API