E.I. DuPont De Nemours & Co. v. Phillips Petroleum Co.
District Court, D. Delaware
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
LATCHUM, Senior District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
Plaintiff (“DuPont”) has moved this Court for entry of a final judgment pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 54(b) on defendants’ (“Phillips”) 1 counterclaim for a declaratory judgment in this patent infringement action. (Docket Item [“D.I.”] 319.) This motion is the latest maneuver by the parties in this case to have their respective forum of choice pass first on the patent in suit, U.S. patent 4,076,698 (“’698”). Phillips wants the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (the “Patent Office”) to find it unpatentable, while DuPont wants this…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Franchise Tax Bd. of Cal. v. Construction Laborers Vacation Trust for Southern Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Landis v. North American Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Powell v. McCormackSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Aetna Life Insurance v. HaworthSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Curtiss-Wright Corp. v. General Electric Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Magnesystems, Inc. v. Nikken, Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 1996
- CORDANCE CORP. v. Amazon. Com, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 2010
- E.I. Du Pont De Nemours & Company v. Phillips Petroleum Company, Phillips 66 Company, and Phillips Driscopipe, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1993