Legal Opinion
Magnesystems, Inc. v. Nikken, Inc.
District Court, C.D. California
Decided July 30, 1996No. CV94-0715 ABC (EEx)PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER RE: DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE AMENDED ANSWER AND COUNTERCLAIMS
COLLINS, District Judge.
Defendants’ Motion for Leave to File an Amended Answer and Counterclaims was taken under submission on June 3, 1996. After reviewing the materials submitted by the parties and the case file, it is hereby ORDERED that Defendants’ motion is DENIED.
I. Factual and Procedural Background
This is a patent infringement case. Plaintiff MAGNESYSTEMS, INC., (“Magnesys-tems”) owns all rights and interests in United States Letters Patent No. 4,489,711 (“ ’711 Patent”). The U.S. Patent and Trademark Office…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- Quern v. JordanSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Christianson v. Colt Industries Operating Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Blonder-Tongue Laboratories, Inc. v. University of Illinois FoundationSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Varity Corp. v. HoweSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Dcd Programs, Ltd. v. Michael W. Leighton, Hill, Farrer & BurrillCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Kuschner v. Nationwide Credit, Inc.District Court, E.D. California · 2009
- Ischay v. BarnhartDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2005
- Coup v. Scottsdale Plaza Resort, LLCDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2011
- Facebook, Inc. v. Power Ventures, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2017
- (PC) Hendon v. BaroyaDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2020
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.